PRESS RELEASE
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE, July 29, 2005
CONTACT:
Illinois Right to Life Committee
William Beckman, Executive Director, 312-422-9300
Frist lacks ethical clarity on stem cell research
Today,
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist established his support for expansion of
embryonic stem cell research funded by the Federal government. He indicated
that he now considers President Bush's 2001 policy too limiting in the number of stem
cell lines that it allows to qualify for embryonic stem cell research. Frist wants
to allow excess embryos from in vitro fertilization to be donated by the parents for
research, if they would otherwise discard them. In effect, Frist is willing to let
the parents be responsible for the decision to kill their excess embryos and then step in
to encourage the parents to allow these embryos to be killed for scientific progress
so at least "some good" comes from them.
At the same time Frist acknowledges that these embryos are
"nascent human life" that is "genetically distinct" and
"biologically human". These facts lead Frist to conclude that a human
embryo "deserves to be treated with the utmost dignity and respect." He
fails to explain how killing this human embryo to obtain its stem cells offers
it this utmost dignity and respect. How does Senator Frist define the terms
"dignity" and "respect"? One can only conclude that Senator
Frist has fallen into the trap of the end justifies the means. In this case,
dignity and respect are achieved through scientific progress while ignoring that
the means required to achieve this progress involves killing the embryo.
President Bush's policy refused to allow any more killing of human embryos
for Federally funded research. Funds could only be made available for stem cell
lines that had already been created. While this policy may not have been
morally perfect, it does prevent the killing of human embryos with Federal funds so it
achieves ethical clarity. In contrast, Senator Frist wants to fund the ongoing
killing of human embryos for stem cell research as long as the parents are willing to
discard their embryos. Such a policy lacks ethical clarity and can only lead to
further justification for more killing by establishing even more circumstances where the
end is found to justify the means.
Illinois Right to Life Committee expresses our total
rejection of the embryonic stem cell research policy suggested by
Senator Frist. Using "discarded" embryos for research does not
display respect for those human beings, because the end does not justify the means.
Why can't we expect that more parents will be motivated to "discard" their
excess embryos when they learn that research will benefit? They will be less likely
to choose offering them for adoption or freezing them for potential later
use. Even saying "potential later use" demonstrates that the
real source of ethical confusion here is the in vitro fertilization
(IVF) process itself. IVF involves using human embryos to solve the
fertility problems of their parents. The end does not justify the means here
either. Now we can see where the slippery slope is taking us by creating these
excess embryos in the first place.
William
Beckman
Executive Director
Illinois Right to Life Committee
65 E. Wacker Place, Suite 800
Chicago, IL 60601
312-422-9300
beckman@illinoisrighttolife.org
www.illinoisrighttolife.org
* * * * * * * *
Illinois Right to Life Committee,
founded in 1968, is the oldest Pro-Life educational organization in Illinois.
|