Illinois Right to Life Committee


Frist lacks ethical clarity on stem cell research


PRESS RELEASE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, July 29, 2005

CONTACT:      Illinois Right to Life Committee
William Beckman, Executive Director, 312-422-9300

Frist lacks ethical clarity on stem cell research

Today, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist established his support for expansion of embryonic stem cell research funded by the Federal government.  He indicated that he now considers President Bush's 2001 policy too limiting in the number of stem cell lines that it allows to qualify for embryonic stem cell research.  Frist wants to allow excess embryos from in vitro fertilization to be donated by the parents for research, if they would otherwise discard them.  In effect, Frist is willing to let the parents be responsible for the decision to kill their excess embryos and then step in to encourage the parents to allow these embryos to be killed for scientific progress so at least "some good" comes from them.

 

At the same time Frist acknowledges that these embryos are "nascent human life" that is "genetically distinct" and "biologically human".  These facts lead Frist to conclude that a human embryo "deserves to be treated with the utmost dignity and respect."  He fails to explain how killing this human embryo to obtain its stem cells offers it this utmost dignity and respect.  How does Senator Frist define the terms "dignity" and "respect"?  One can only conclude that Senator Frist has fallen into the trap of the end justifies the means.  In this case, dignity and respect are achieved through scientific progress while ignoring that the means required to achieve this progress involves killing the embryo.

President Bush's policy refused to allow any more killing of human embryos for Federally funded research.  Funds could only be made available for stem cell lines that had already been created.  While this policy may not have been morally perfect, it does prevent the killing of human embryos with Federal funds so it achieves ethical clarity.  In contrast, Senator Frist wants to fund the ongoing killing of human embryos for stem cell research as long as the parents are willing to discard their embryos.  Such a policy lacks ethical clarity and can only lead to further justification for more killing by establishing even more circumstances where the end is found to justify the means.

Illinois Right to Life Committee expresses our total rejection of the embryonic stem cell research policy suggested by Senator Frist.  Using "discarded" embryos for research does not display respect for those human beings, because the end does not justify the means.  Why can't we expect that more parents will be motivated to "discard" their excess embryos when they learn that research will benefit?   They will be less likely to choose offering them for adoption or freezing them for potential later use.  Even saying "potential later use" demonstrates that the real source of ethical confusion here is the in vitro fertilization (IVF) process itself.  IVF involves using human embryos to solve the fertility problems of their parents.  The end does not justify the means here either.  Now we can see where the slippery slope is taking us by creating these excess embryos in the first place.    

William Beckman
Executive Director
Illinois Right to Life Committee
65 E. Wacker Place, Suite 800
Chicago, IL 60601
312-422-9300
beckman@illinoisrighttolife.org
www.illinoisrighttolife.org

 

* * * * * * * *

Illinois Right to Life Committee, founded in 1968, is the oldest Pro-Life educational organization in Illinois.