Mandatory Insurance Coverage for Contraception?

Illinois Right to Life Committee

Mandatory Insurance Coverage
for Contraception?

RFM NEWS
Dan Zanoza, managing editor
Dan@rfmnews.com
www.RFMNEWS.com
Chicago, Illinois

May 6, 2003

Illinois Senate to consider mandatory insurance coverage for contraceptives

SPRINGFIELD, IL (RFM NEWS) This week the Illinois Senate is expected to vote on a bill that would require insurance companies expand coverage to include the cost of contraceptives, contraceptive devices and services. HB 211, a bill that would amend a section of the Illinois Insurance Code, is currently in its second reading in the state Senate. The legislation was sponsored in the House of Representatives by Sara Feigenholtz (D-12, Chicago). The House
passed HB 211 earlier this session. Iris Martinez (D-20, Chicago) is the Senate sponsor.

Critics believe this legislation will force those who morally and ethically oppose contraception to pay for contraceptives through higher insurance premiums. Pro-life organizations cite the fact that some contraceptives can also be used as abortifacients.

"The legislation is highly ambiguous," said Ralph Rivera, Legislative Chairman, Illinois Citizens for Life. "For example, there are some questions concerning the term 'contraceptive services.' The language in the bill needs to be more specific. It's not acceptable as it stands."

HB 211 will likely be challenged, if passed into law. The Catholic Church, along with a number of other faith-based institutions, oppose some or all forms of contraception, in varying degrees. There may be Constitutional battles, if Illinois residents are required to pay for such services through their insurance policies. In addition, the legislation would affect insurance companies serving both the public and private sectors.

Most certainly, an individual or group would pursue relief from state or federal courts, citing the fact their religious liberty would be violated if the Illinois state Insurance Code were amended to require insurance providers include contraceptives and/or contraceptive services. Industry observers acknowledge the cost for contraceptive coverage would eventually be passed along to consumers.

Some see the term "contraceptive services" as possibly including abortions. Opponents of HB 211 feel the legislation may open a Pandora's box.

* * * * * * * *