In July, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was quoted in the New York Times saying, “Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.” It was a shocking statement by a very powerful person in the United States. It’s surprising to learn that her position about population, birth control and abortion are consistent with the eugenics movement.

Maafa 21 is a new film produced by Mark Crutcher and Life Dynamics. Maafa is a Swahili word for disaster. It exposes the hidden and bitter realities of Black Genocide in modern America. The movie traces the eugenics movement from the end of slavery until today. The early eugenicists were concerned about the impact of freeing the slaves and looked for methods to control the growth of the black population.

It includes the involvement of Margaret Sanger, founder of the American Birth Control League in 1921, which eventually became Planned Parenthood.  She was actively involved in the eugenics movement and many eugenicists served in Planned Parenthood as well. She was a regular speaker at eugenicist and racist conferences. After giving a speech to one chapter of the Ku Klux Klan, she was invited to speak at several other Klan meetings.

When Hitler came to power in the 1930’s in Germany, many people from the American eugenics movement were advocates of his policies to promote a pure race.  These same people were involved in the American Birth Control League and later Planned Parenthood.

The film covers forced sterilization in the 60’s and the push for birth control and abortion, with blacks the primary target. The evidence drawn from numerous speeches and books is convincing. It is clear that the program has been consistently advanced since its early conception by the eugenicists and is ongoing.

The film records the involvement of powerful people and corporations, including the Rockefellers, Warren Buffet, The Carnegie Foundation and Bill Gates, in eugenics and population control. It describes the efforts of the United States, including some of our presidents, to export population control throughout the world and especially to control the growth of the black population. You hear the voice of President Nixon from the recently released tapes of his Administration, promoting population control against blacks. The issue crosses all political lines.

Planned Parenthood was essentially “hired” to implement the policies of black genocide by providing that organization with funds for “family planning” so that it wouldn’t be perceived as a government program of genocide. Over 80% of Planned Parenthood’s facilities are located in minority communities. Blacks represent only 13% of the population, but account for 37% of all abortions.

The film documents how we export our policies of abortion and birth control around the world. US funds for developing nations, such as Africa and Central America, are often tied to acceptance of birth control and abortion.

After watching this movie it’s hard to understand why the African American community is not more involved in the Pro-Life movement, since they are clearly the target. In the late 60’s, many civil rights activists, including the Black Panthers and even Jesse Jackson, recognized that population control was directed toward eliminating the black community. Jackson was against abortion and concerned about black genocide until he ran for President.

This movie is an excellent tool to educate the African-American community about the abortion lobby’s real agenda. It will have an impact on everyone who sees it, not only because the abortion lobby’s agenda is so blatantly racist, but sadly because it is true.

For more information about the film go to Maafa21.com.

Rosemary Hackett

Researchers from the Federal Vaccine Events Reporting System recently issued a report concluding that the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine Gardasil has a 400% higher rate of adverse effects than another comparable vaccine, the Menactra anti-meningitis shot. Why did this report not make the news? 

The researchers considered Gardasil and Menactra equivalent for the purposes of comparison because they are given to similar age groups at similar frequencies.  The researchers wrote, “It is unusual for there to be such a big discrepancy between two vaccines used in similar populations involving serious and relatively rare life threatening adverse events and autoimmune disorders.”

The study concluded that Gardasil was associated with twice as many emergency room visits, four times as many deaths, four times as many heart attacks, seven times as many “disabled” reports and 15 times as many strokes.  Even fainting occurred six times more often, countering the claim that ‘fear’ of needles caused it, since both shots are given to girls in the same age group.

The report recommends that the government more thoroughly investigate reports of dangerous side effects from the HPV vaccine, that research be conducted into mechanisms by which the vaccine might cause these effects, and that patients and parents be more adequately warned of the risks before vaccination.  It also recommends that Congress investigate how the vaccine was fast-tracked for approval in the absence of safety data on girls younger than 17.

These recommendations confirm the concerns that Pro-Lifers raised from the beginning.  The risks from Gardasil appear to far outweigh its benefits, making it too dangerous to use, especially given the limited protection it offers against HPV, and the even less impact it might have in preventing cervical cancer.  One of Merck’s own researchers, Dr. Diane Harper, told CBS News that a girl is more likely to die from an adverse reaction to Gardasil than from cervical cancer. As recommended by IRLC before, just say NO if any doctor pushes this vaccine on your daughter.

Use of aborted fetal cell cultures to produce vaccines has raised moral concerns and led some parents to avoid such vaccines for moral reasons. Theresa Deisher, based on her career experience with biotechnology, recognized these moral issues as well. Ultimately, she decided to form the company AVM Biotechnology with a mission to produce vaccines and other medicines using moral means.

As Deisher reviewed the situation with vaccines derived using aborted fetal cell cultures, she evaluated another concern, the increasing incidence of autism following childhood vaccinations. She noted that the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder began rising dramatically in the USA after 1978 and in the United Kingdom in 1988. In both nations, increasing cases of autism followed introduction of a new measles-mumps-rubella vaccine that used aborted fetal cell cultures.

While studies have been done that concluded the mercury additive in this vaccine did not contribute to increased cases of autism, Deisher pointed out that “what was not considered in any studies done to date was an examination of the potential health consequences of having contaminating DNA from the producing cell line in the final vaccine product.”

Might aborted fetal cell DNA be the source of this tragic increase in autism? Can it be purely a coincidence that autism increases dramatically in two nations after introduction of a new vaccine? If not, what might be the cause of such tragedy? Here is a theory that has merit to be studied seriously. Some outside agent must be involved when autism jumps from less than four children per 10,000 in 1978 to 68 per 10,000 by 2000, and continues to increase to as many as 100 per 10,000 in 2009.

Even without knowing the cause, the connection between autism and this vaccine seems to suggest a danger that should be avoided. Therefore, parents may have two good reasons to avoid vaccines derived through use of aborted fetal cell cultures, both a moral issue and the potential medical risk that may exist from aborted fetal cell DNA.

The British medical journal Lancet has been cited as one of the most reputable medical journals in the world (September 2, 2008 LifeSiteNews.com).  The Lancet earned this citation by publishing articles that have challenged the politically correct position on various medical topics.

A recent Lancet editorial has countered that pattern in a shocking way.  In this editorial, the publishers of Lancet said contraception should be distributed on a worldwide basis — specifically in nations in Africa — to cut back on the population as a solution for so-called climate change.

Lancet editors followed the lead of the London School of Economics in advocating population control as a solution for climate change.  A researcher at that school suggested contraception would be more cost effective in reducing global CO2 emissions than use of green technologies.

Given the collapsing population already occurring in so many nations, the Lancet should reconsider this serious lapse in common sense of jumping on the population control bandwagon when it courts disastrous consequences for the future of many nations.