If you were told about a product that would fail 15% of the time over one year, would you consider that product reliable?  I suspect not.  If you were told that a new car’s engine or transmission had a 100% failure rate over a five-year period, would you find that performance acceptable?  I am certain that you would not.

The February 2005 issue of Consumer Reports not only rates automobiles, but they also rate condoms. Consumer Reports gives seven condom products excellent ratings on its test results with overall ratings of very good.  They rate the vast majority of condoms tested as very good overall.   However, their comparative guide to contraceptives included with these ratings shows that in “typical” use, the male condom fails 15 times per 100 users per year.  Statistically, in less than five years this becomes a 100% failure rate.

What does “typical use” mean?  For condoms, it is contrasted with a failure rate of only 2 per 100 “if used perfectly”.  For the birth control pill, the failure rate is 8 per 100 in typical use.  These statistics seem to confirm that “typical use” must mean normal usage by average people.

Condoms are claimed to be important to prevent teen pregnancy.  Can teenagers be considered typical users?   That seems unlikely.  If failure rates go even higher for less typical users, this means that a teenage girl who relies on condoms for protection has a 100% chance of getting pregnant at least once during 4 years of high school.  Does that sound like safe sex?

No wonder Consumer Reports also provides information on abortion options.  Clearly, people who rely on their ratings in choosing contraceptives will need abortions somewhere along the way. Consumer Reports claims a “typical” abortion is at least 12 times safer than childbirth.  In fact, when a truly scientific study was done to compare the risks of abortion and childbirth, abortion was found to be at least four times more dangerous than childbirth (see www.AfterAbortion.org).

Of course, prevention of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) has a higher failure rate than pregnancy.  Some STDs can be transmitted even when a condom is used “perfectly”.  How long will it take for teenagers to acquire one or more STDs?

Consumer Reports claims to be unbiased in their ratings.  However, the biographical information available on James Guest, the CEO of Consumers Union, which publishes the magazine, shows that he previously headed Planned Parenthood of Maryland.  Given the disconnect between condom “ratings” and results in typical use, the virtual endorsement of abortion as the birth control choice of last resort, and the inaccurate information that minimizes the health risks of abortion, it appears that the Planned Parenthood party line was very effectively conveyed in this Consumer Reports article.

It seems safe to conclude that Consumers Union is not unbiased regarding condoms and other birth control methods.   You might want to express your concern to Consumer Reports about their misleading coverage of condoms and birth control, or even cancel your subscription in response to their bias.

Ironically, two out of three condoms distributed by Planned Parenthood received poor ratings with recommendations that they be avoided.  Who are the most likely users of Planned Parenthood condoms?   With names like lollipop, honeydew, and assorted colors, who else, but teenagers?   No wonder Planned Parenthood continues to commit more abortions each year, remaining unchallenged as the largest abortion provider in the nation.   From its 2003/2004 annual report, Planned Parenthood increased the number of surgical abortions committed at its own facilities by 6.1 percent to 244,628.

At Speak Out Illinois 2005, Doug Scott of Life Decisions International provided an update on the effort to expose Planned Parenthood.  He pointed out that they are the only organization that is never held accountable for results.  When pregnancy and abortion rates go up, Planned Parenthood claims they need more money for more sex education, birth control, and abortion.  When they get more money and nothing changes, they come back again with the same claims.  How long will our government leaders be duped by this lack of results?  They should be ending the waste of taxpayer money lavished on Planned Parenthood by directing it to programs that work.  They are called abstinence programs.

Planned Parenthood measures success by the number of users of their services.  Under their norm, they are always successful because their version of sex education guarantees increased use of their services, but never reduces “unwanted” pregnancy or abortion rates.  It is time that Planned Parenthood was held accountable for the bad results their users have incurred.

Bill Beckman